By Stacey - Tuesday, June 12, 2012 - 20:51
Do you find church history boring? What about 'minor' arguments about words? Does any of that stuff even matter?
Recently I had to write an essay about the deity of Jesus. The question asked about the 4th century heretic, Arius, and what was at stake in his claims about Jesus. As Christians we often take for granted that Jesus is God. But does it really matter? And if so, why does it?
Arius was born in Libya a long time ago, only 150-200 years after the New Testament was written. At the time, the church was trying to grapple with the implications of the apparent paradox that Jesus Christ was both fully God and fully man. If there was one God, what did it mean to say that Jesus Christ was God? Was it true? Did God change from one to the other, or gradually expand who he was?
Arius argued that because God could not change, the Son could not be everlasting creator God, but rather the first of God's creatures. This is summed up in his famous statement about the Christ: "There was when he was not"
In 325 AD, a church council met at Nicea and condemned Arius as a heretic and excommunicated him from the church. It produced a creed stating that Jesus Christ was the Son of God, of one substance with the Father. After decades of more controversy over the issue, the Council of Constantinople in 381 AD affirmed the creed of the Council of Nicea and produced the Nicene Creed which we use in churches to this day, confirming that we believe Jesus Christ to be the 'only Son of God ... True God from True God, begotten not made, of one being with the Father'.
For those who argued against Arius, the very issue of salvation was at stake. Athanasius, who led the argument against Arius and his followers, maintained that only God in flesh could redeem and reconcile mankind.
So why does this argument over a few Greek words matter for us almost 1700 years later?
Only one who is both fully God and fully man can effect our salvation for us - man must pay the price for sin but only God is able to.
We are surrounded by people, inside and outside the church, who do not believe that Jesus Christ was really God, but want to insist that he was just a good man.
Our understanding of the truth of Scripture matters. Jesus' followers were convinced he was personally divine. John's gospel leaves us in no doubt that Jesus was both God, and eternal (from the beginning) (John 1:1f). This is affirmed by the apostle Paul (Phil 2:6 and Col 1:16f) and by the writer to the Hebrews (ch 1). To deny Jesus' deity is to deny Scripture is true.
Human reason is not above Scripture. That is not to say that when we become Christians we leave our brains at the door. Far from it! But we are to allow Scripture to inform our thinking, not our thinking inform Scripture. In what areas do we allow our culture and our thinking to dictate our understanding of God's word?
Within the trinity there is both equality of being, and an order that cannot be reversed. One does not exclude the other.